{"id":2991,"date":"2013-02-15T09:00:00","date_gmt":"2013-02-15T09:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mpulse.cloud.fruitionqa.com\/the-evolution-of-preventive-maintenance-pm-blog\/"},"modified":"2025-07-30T06:30:51","modified_gmt":"2025-07-30T06:30:51","slug":"pm-evolution","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/blog\/maintenance-management\/pm-evolution\/","title":{"rendered":"The Evolution of Preventive Maintenance (PM)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Array
\n[related-content]<\/p>\n

How does preventive maintenance work? In the beginning, maintenance technicians decided to do preventive maintenance (PM) on machinery to prevent breakdowns and failures.<\/p>\n

This was a good thing.<\/p>\n

They used the calendar, or time intervals<\/em>, as the scheduling basis for PMs, mainly because it was easiest for everyone to remember. For example, “Change the light bulb the first of every month.”<\/p>\n

Things were good.<\/p>\n

However, tasks tended to stack up on the first of the month as volume grew.\u00a0 So schedules needed to be staggered and juggled to match available resources.<\/p>\n

This was confusing.<\/p>\n

Along came the chalkboard, and later whiteboards, for scheduling AND tracking future PMs.<\/p>\n

Life was better.<\/p>\n

But chalkboards and whiteboards couldn\u2019t report on PM compliance, nor could they adequately track the cost of a PM program. For cost and compliance tracking maintenance managers moved to computerized maintenance management systems (CMMS<\/em>). The scheduling was still calendar–<\/em>based with a CMMS, but now the maintenance department could schedule, track, and report on compliance and monitor costs.<\/p>\n

Life was good.<\/p>\n

As the implementation of more and more PM activities increased, though, so did the cost of maintenance. There was often an inverse correlation between the amount of preventive maintenance<\/a> perform and total maintenance cost. Pressure came to lengthen time increments between PMs, often from once a month to once every other month. This worried many maintenance people.<\/p>\n

Life was confusing. More PMs, in this case, did not mean better results.<\/p>\n

The next evolution up the PM ladder for maintenance departments was\u00a0usage-based scheduling. For the most part, intervals of time are less relevant than amount of usage to failure prevention. Usage-based PM scheduling typically reduces costs and still provides compliance reporting while scheduling and tracking. Most computer systems could combine time and<\/em> usage numbers.<\/p>\n

Life was very good.<\/p>\n

Unfortunately, both usage-based and time-based methods tended to create artificial\u2014and often ineffective\u2014maintenance intervals. Who can really know if a filter should be changed every 500 hours of fan operation, anyway? Sure, that may be an average interval for an average application. But we all know there are no average shops or average applications. They vary widely across a range of environments. The condition<\/em> of a filter may still be good after 500 hours, or it may be restricted after 400 hours, needing replacement.<\/p>\n

Today, maintenance intervals can be scheduled based on asset or part condition. Condition-based PM scheduling triggers PMs just before the point when system inefficiencies or failures begin to occur. Implementing condition based maintenance (CBM) allows reporting on compliance, lowers your costs, AND improves reliability.<\/p>\n

Now life is very, very good.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Array [related-content] How does preventive maintenance work? In the beginning, maintenance technicians decided to do preventive maintenance (PM) on machinery to prevent breakdowns and failures. This was a good thing. They used the calendar, or time intervals, as the scheduling basis for PMs, mainly because it was easiest for everyone to remember. For example, “Change the light bulb the first of every month.” Things were good. However, tasks tended to stack up on the first of the month as volume grew.\u00a0 So schedules needed to be staggered and juggled to match available resources. This was confusing. Along came the chalkboard, and later whiteboards, for scheduling AND tracking future PMs. Life was better. But chalkboards and whiteboards couldn\u2019t report on PM compliance, nor could they adequately track the cost of a PM program. For cost and compliance tracking maintenance managers moved to computerized maintenance management systems (CMMS). The scheduling was still calendar–based with a CMMS, but now the maintenance department could schedule, track, and report on compliance and monitor costs. Life was good. As the implementation of more and more PM activities increased, though, so did the cost of maintenance. There was often an inverse correlation between the amount of preventive maintenance perform and total maintenance cost. Pressure came to lengthen time increments between PMs, often from once a month to once every other month. This worried many maintenance people. Life was confusing. More PMs, in this case, did not mean better results. The next evolution up the PM ladder for maintenance departments was\u00a0usage-based scheduling. For the most part, intervals of time are less relevant than amount of usage to failure prevention. Usage-based PM scheduling typically reduces costs and still provides compliance reporting while scheduling and tracking. Most computer systems could combine time and usage numbers. Life was very good. Unfortunately, both usage-based and time-based methods tended to create artificial\u2014and often ineffective\u2014maintenance intervals. Who can really know if a filter should be changed every 500 hours of fan operation, anyway? Sure, that may be an average interval for an average application. But we all know there are no average shops or average applications. They vary widely across a range of environments. The condition of a filter may still be good after 500 hours, or it may be restricted after 400 hours, needing replacement. Today, maintenance intervals can be scheduled based on asset or part condition. Condition-based PM scheduling triggers PMs just before the point when system inefficiencies or failures begin to occur. Implementing condition based maintenance (CBM) allows reporting on compliance, lowers your costs, AND improves reliability. Now life is very, very good.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"content-type":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2991","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-maintenance-management"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Evolution of Preventive Maintenance (PM) | MPulse Software<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Explore the history of preventive maintenance and how it has evolved to improve scheduling and tracking of maintenance tasks.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/blog\/maintenance-management\/pm-evolution\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Evolution of Preventive Maintenance (PM)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Explore the history of preventive maintenance and how it has evolved to improve scheduling and tracking of maintenance tasks.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/blog\/maintenance-management\/pm-evolution\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MPulse Software\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2013-02-15T09:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-07-30T06:30:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/MPulse-Home-Featured-Image.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"628\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Michelle Nicolson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Michelle Nicolson\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/blog\/maintenance-management\/pm-evolution\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/blog\/maintenance-management\/pm-evolution\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Michelle Nicolson\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/#\/schema\/person\/bd92353973a29542ef16cd8c623465cd\"},\"headline\":\"The Evolution of Preventive Maintenance (PM)\",\"datePublished\":\"2013-02-15T09:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-30T06:30:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/blog\/maintenance-management\/pm-evolution\/\"},\"wordCount\":439,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Maintenance Management\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/blog\/maintenance-management\/pm-evolution\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/blog\/maintenance-management\/pm-evolution\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/blog\/maintenance-management\/pm-evolution\/\",\"name\":\"The Evolution of Preventive Maintenance (PM) | MPulse Software\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2013-02-15T09:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-30T06:30:51+00:00\",\"description\":\"Explore the history of preventive maintenance and how it has evolved to improve scheduling and tracking of maintenance tasks.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/blog\/maintenance-management\/pm-evolution\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/blog\/maintenance-management\/pm-evolution\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/blog\/maintenance-management\/pm-evolution\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Maintenance Management\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/blog\/category\/maintenance-management\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"The Evolution of Preventive Maintenance (PM)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/\",\"name\":\"MPulse Software\",\"description\":\"CMMS Software\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"MPulse Software\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/image-5.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/image-5.png\",\"width\":315,\"height\":105,\"caption\":\"MPulse Software\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/#\/schema\/person\/bd92353973a29542ef16cd8c623465cd\",\"name\":\"Michelle Nicolson\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d7eb32c3d99be5e0ef8f1f8ec2f47b343d5da4b73a9f77565490e135fc9939d8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d7eb32c3d99be5e0ef8f1f8ec2f47b343d5da4b73a9f77565490e135fc9939d8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d7eb32c3d99be5e0ef8f1f8ec2f47b343d5da4b73a9f77565490e135fc9939d8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Michelle Nicolson\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/blog\/author\/michelleblackcatcommunications-com\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Evolution of Preventive Maintenance (PM) | MPulse Software","description":"Explore the history of preventive maintenance and how it has evolved to improve scheduling and tracking of maintenance tasks.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/blog\/maintenance-management\/pm-evolution\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Evolution of Preventive Maintenance (PM)","og_description":"Explore the history of preventive maintenance and how it has evolved to improve scheduling and tracking of maintenance tasks.","og_url":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/blog\/maintenance-management\/pm-evolution\/","og_site_name":"MPulse Software","article_published_time":"2013-02-15T09:00:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-07-30T06:30:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":628,"url":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/MPulse-Home-Featured-Image.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Michelle Nicolson","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Michelle Nicolson","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/blog\/maintenance-management\/pm-evolution\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/blog\/maintenance-management\/pm-evolution\/"},"author":{"name":"Michelle Nicolson","@id":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/#\/schema\/person\/bd92353973a29542ef16cd8c623465cd"},"headline":"The Evolution of Preventive Maintenance (PM)","datePublished":"2013-02-15T09:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-30T06:30:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/blog\/maintenance-management\/pm-evolution\/"},"wordCount":439,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Maintenance Management"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/blog\/maintenance-management\/pm-evolution\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/blog\/maintenance-management\/pm-evolution\/","url":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/blog\/maintenance-management\/pm-evolution\/","name":"The Evolution of Preventive Maintenance (PM) | MPulse Software","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2013-02-15T09:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-30T06:30:51+00:00","description":"Explore the history of preventive maintenance and how it has evolved to improve scheduling and tracking of maintenance tasks.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/blog\/maintenance-management\/pm-evolution\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/blog\/maintenance-management\/pm-evolution\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/blog\/maintenance-management\/pm-evolution\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Maintenance Management","item":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/blog\/category\/maintenance-management\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"The Evolution of Preventive Maintenance (PM)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/","name":"MPulse Software","description":"CMMS Software","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/#organization","name":"MPulse Software","url":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/image-5.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/image-5.png","width":315,"height":105,"caption":"MPulse Software"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/#\/schema\/person\/bd92353973a29542ef16cd8c623465cd","name":"Michelle Nicolson","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d7eb32c3d99be5e0ef8f1f8ec2f47b343d5da4b73a9f77565490e135fc9939d8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d7eb32c3d99be5e0ef8f1f8ec2f47b343d5da4b73a9f77565490e135fc9939d8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d7eb32c3d99be5e0ef8f1f8ec2f47b343d5da4b73a9f77565490e135fc9939d8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Michelle Nicolson"},"url":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/blog\/author\/michelleblackcatcommunications-com\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2991","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2991"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2991\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2991"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2991"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mpulsesoftware.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2991"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}